PUC Caves to Political Pressure: Rhode Island Consumers Lose Again
Press Release: 08/12/2010
Contact: Jack Colby (401)884-0788
Last spring the Public Utility Commission (PUC) voted to
reject National Grid's (NG) proposal to buy energy from Deepwater Wind (DW). DW
had been granted the authority by NG to petition the PUC to build an eight
turbine wind farm off of Block Island. The sweetheart deal between NG and DW did
not provide any opportunity for other companies in the wind-to-energy business
to submit more cost competitive energy plans. Without any competitive incentive,
DW submitted a plan to sell Rhode Islanders NG energy at 24.4 cents a kilowatt
hour, increasing each year by 3.5% over a 20 year contract period. Comparing
that rate to the current cost of electricity paid by NG to buy electricity from
current sources, 9.2 cents per kilowatt hour, the PUC, wisely, rejected the DW
proposal. By rejecting the NG and DW incestuous plan, the PUC lived-up to its
responsibility to protect utility customers from powerful monopolies that, when
unregulated, can strangle electric customers with high utility bills.
The PUC's unanimous decision to reject the NG/DW plan did
not sit well with our governor who does not take well to democratic processes
that frustrate his Napoleonic model of governance. Casting aside any pretence of
the PUC's policy-setting prerogative, the Governor Carcieri declared that the
PUC was just a “rate setting body” that could be forced back to the table to
“reconsider” the NG/DW proposal. Determined to make the PUC get it right this
time, Governor Carcieri teamed up with two unlikely allies to box-in the PUC by
limiting the criteria the commissioners could use to re-evaluate DW's wind-farm
proposal.
Seemingly star-struck by Mr. Carcieri's sidling-up to them,
House Speaker Gordon Fox and Senate President Teresa Paiva-Weed, helped to pass
legislation that hand-cuffed the three PUC commissioners' deliberations. The
emergency legislation flew through the legislature in just one week. While it
often takes years to pass progressive legislation that protects consumers (On
this point, the George Wiley Center was been working for seven years to get the
General Assembly leadership to pass legislation that would lower gas and
electricity rates for Rhode Islanders who qualify for federal heating
assistance), the Carcieri-Fox-Paiva-Weed initiative created a fast-track for
legislation that assisted the special-interests of two monopolistic companies.
That initiative will increase those company's profits while aggravating Rhode
Island's energy crisis affecting struggling families, the elderly, and children:
last year 31,500 Rhode Island households had their gas or electricity shut-off
by NG. Many of those shut-offs resulted when families, strapped for cash in this
extreme recession, lost the capacity to pay their ever increasing utility bills.
National Grid, a British company, has managed to recolonize New England with its
company-store economics.
Constrained in their deliberations by the legislation that
limited the criteria they could use for reconsidering the DW wind plan, on
August 12, 2010, the PUC -- in a 2-1 vote -- caved into the Carcieri-General
Assembly-NG/DW cabal and approved the DW plan which just months earlier they had
unanimously rejected. Ignoring the testimony of RI business leaders and energy
analysts that DW-generated energy will hurt businesses and individual consumers,
the PUC fed the voracious corporate machine abetted by our so-called business
governor and the general assembly leadership.
Looking on the bright side, consumers can take solace in
the role played by Rhode Island's Attorney general, Patrick Lynch, and the
Conservation Law Foundation. The AG and the CLF fought to protect consumers and
small businesses during this sordid process. More importantly going forward,
both the AG and the CLF have vowed to go to court to stop the DW project. Both
the AG and CLF have argued that the reconsideration of the NG/DW proposal was
unconstitutional on the grounds that, once heard by the PUC, the NG/DW proposal
is not permitted reconsidered. We will all have to wait to see how the courts
rule on this matter under a precedent called res judicata, a legal term
that means, “the matter has been settled.”
Members of the George Wiley Center lead a public education
and organizing effort to stop the NG/DW proposal based on the economics of the plan.
Knowing as we do that the cost
of energy, monopolistically controlled by National Grid in RI, is strangling
consumers, we have argued that the DW-generated energy was excessively costly.
We were troubled as too by the process initiated by Governor Carcieri that
stripped the PUC of its regulatory independence.
The Wiley Center's state-wide collaborative will continue
to oppose the DW project. While we support the development of renewable energy
initiatives in Rhode Island, we insist that those initiatives be established in
an open and competitive way and benefit consumers as well as the energy
providers. That is to say, in a way that differs dramatically from the secretive
and costly NG/DW proposal. We would also like to thank Commissioner Mary Bray for
her courageous vote to oppose the plan.